Despair... Bafana Bafana out on penalties |
Rantie
had the most notable chance, but he was smothered swiftly by the outstanding Mali keeper
Soumbeyla Diakite who would turn out to be the night’s hero for his country.
Indecision
and rushing cost Bafana Bafana a few more openings. However, such was their
dominance South Africa
looked well on their way to a first Nations Cup semi-final since 2000 when
Rantie gave them a deserved 31st minute lead.
The
changes Igesund made had worked beautifully. Siboniso Gaxa came in at
right-back for the suspended Anele Ncgongca and his crossing on the overlap –
just as at the 2009 Confederations Cup – was a feature early on for Bafana.
Midfielder
Reneilwe Letsholonyane, who hadn’t had the most noteworthy tournament, was
inspired on the night after replacing front-man Katlego Mphela in the starting
line-up.
Both
Gaxa and Letsholonyane were involved in several promising occasions early on. Good
pressure, a feature of Bafana’s first half play, produced the first real
opportunity with Gaxa finding space to cross for the industrious May Mahlangu.
Letsholonyane then slipped a clever through-ball for Rantie but Mali defender
Adama Tamboura recovered brilliantly to thwart the danger.
Igesund’s
changes meant a change to a 4-2-3-1 formation. As a result Bafana were much
more solid as unit with the defence far less exposed. The hosts were able to
swarm Mali
in midfield then break forward with almost reckless abandon. It was high octane
stuff, and it’s how South
Africa ’s goal came about – a fast break
started by Itumeleng Khune’s accurate kick, ending up with Rantie finding the
net seconds later.
But
just as one missing brick can bring down a wall, so too can one change wreck a
football team.
When
Rantie went off injured shortly after his goal, coincidentally or not, the game
changed. Rantie’s replacement Lehlohonolo Majoro was unable to offer the same
threat either through pace down the channels or through competing with Mali ’s
centre-backs.
Other
factors played a part as well. Bafana simply got tired. They were unable to
maintain their ferocious first half pace and attacking breaks became more
sporadic.
Majoro
had a rare sight on goal on 51 minutes, but a heavy touch and a lack of
strength saw a decent chance slip away.
These,
unfortunately, are the margins in international
football, and a few minutes later Seydou Keita ghosted in behind a static Bafana
defence to head in the equaliser.
There are many positives
for South Africa
to take forward from the game and the tournament as a whole. The intensity at
which they played against Mali
was superb. They pressed Mali
and were always primed to spring forward in adventurous attack.
Ball
movement and retention was also excellent at times, almost
unrecognisable from the side that has struggled so much recently. Players such as Mahlangu have put up their hands as top-class
performers, while others such as Khune have only reaffirmed their outstanding ability.
There
are also lessons. The first surely is there has to be more focus on physicality
and fitness. South Africa
has the facilities to produce world-class athletes, and its footballers need to
join the party.
Too much power... Bafana's Reneilwe Letsholonyane is brushed aside by Samba Sow |
This
has to change.
In
international football, and more especially Africa ,
fitness counts for a lot.
It’s difficult to see Mali going on
and winning Nations Cup. They are a team of well-managed parts, doing just
enough to stifle the opponent. However, when it comes to forcing the issue,
which it will inevitably come down to at some, stage it is difficult to see Mali
thriving.
But
they are establishing themselves. Two consecutive Nations Cup semi-final
appearances and a fourth since 2002 is no mean feat. Mali are definitely an African
power.
No comments:
Post a Comment